This is a false comparison. A proton requires three quarks (2 up and 1 down presumably). The two up quarks we could say are equal to each other. But, the down quark is not like the others (watch Sesame Street for more clarification on when one thing is not like the others).
But, the up quark is not the proton.
The proton requires three quarks.
So, you can't even recombobulate a proton into God with component parts holy spirit (the down quark let's say) and the father and son (the two up quarks let's say).
The Trinity states that God is the Father and God is the Son and God is the Holy Spirit. Yet, the Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Holy Spirit and the Father is not the Holy Spirit.
If God is the Father and God is the Son, then the Father must be the Son, according to math. But, the Trinity doctrine says no.
What are we to conclude from these things? First, the proton is safe (Whew!! That's a big one right there!!). Second, the transitive property in math is safe (Whew!! This means point nine repeating is still one using the transitive property!! So, math isn't broken. FYI: I have a degree in math, so my time wasn't wasted learning all that stuff.) Third, Sesame Street is correct, so it can go on teaching kids stuff.
What gives, then? It's the Trinity that is false, which is what my article showed in the first place.